Subtrahend


Saturday, January 31, 2004

    Life is Good


    · Angua has the following to say:

    But sometimes, I look at the people around me, and read their writings (not just Canadians, the Europeans a few entries down, and definitely Americans) and I ask myself what planet they live on. Do they not realize that life is, at bottom, unfair, as well as being bloody, brutish and short?
    I think the expression is "nasty, brutish, and short", and whoever said it was talking about the Middle Ages or something. But her point is a good one. Life can be harsh. I believe popular culture makes people think otherwise, though, or gives them mega-expectations. Everyone is a hero or lives in a big Manhattan apartment, or is important. But in reality no one is. Still, there's no harm in complaining.

    US politics? Zzzzz. Obviously Kerry will be the guy and he will lose to Bush. No, I don't have any pie charts or impressive batches of numerals.

    There doesn't seem to be a website devoted to Pep and Ched, the popular meat & cheese snack of Canada's highways. It's a plastic-encased baton of cheese and "pepperoni" that seems to be sold only in highway gas stations. It is a product of "McSweeney's", which belongs to Prime Brands inc. That's all I know, and it's not enough.


     — posted by P | at 8:51 AM | |

Friday, January 30, 2004

    More about Magritte


    · If you go to Liberté-Cherie you'll find, among other things, a quotation at the top of the page: "Tout homme a droit 24 heures de Liberté par jour" (René Magritte) Well, of course, Magritte was an interesting man. His picture "Ceci n'est pas une pipe" used to boggle me. I mean, who said it was une pipe? It's a picture of une pipe, obviously, obviously. Without being une pipe. His other pictures are horrifying, derived from the fact that when he was a child his mother drowned herself. He and his father ran out and discovered her dead on the bank, her nightdress thrown up and covering her face, Hence the face-covering and anger of his pictures. I think he was the angriest painter in the world, to judge by his pictures.


     — posted by P | at 2:53 PM | |

Thursday, January 29, 2004

    Where is Birmingham, Exactly?


    · You'd think that allies would know a bit about each other. Here's CNN, clarifying: "Azmat Begg, a retired bank manager from the central English city of Birmingham ... " It's a well-known city, but I guess if you've never heard of it, there's some help finding it on the map if they explain that it's in the centre of England. That's why they call it "the Centrelands".

    The rest of the story is about British and French prisoners at Guantanamo (in the southeast of Cuba, which is, itself, in the Caribbean, not far from the Atlantic Ocean).

    It seems hard on these people, but what were they doing in Afghanistan, anyway?


     — posted by P | at 2:00 PM | |

Wednesday, January 28, 2004

    Evils of Office Life


    · The BBC series The Office won a few Golden Globes. It's funny—and maybe a bit too harrowing for anyone who works in an office. Unlike The Drew Carey Show, this series kind of creates a sort of, oh, I don't know ... tension. It's not terribly pleasant. Watch it if you can.


     — posted by P | at 9:29 PM | |

    More Funny Writing


    · Actually, stupid writing. I was watching City Confidential and I heard them say "hand-built walls" to describe a phenomenon to be found in Hunt County, Va.: fences made of stones stacked on each other. Where do these stones comes from? Well, you have to pick rocks out of the fields and load them into a thing on runners (wheels would make it too heavy), and you can then use the stones to make a wall, or parts of it. So I think they meant drystone walls, which keep appearing in the background of the show. Most stone walls have to be made by hand, unless you use pre-stressed concrete. So what do they mean by "hand-built" stone walls?


     — posted by P | at 8:55 PM | |

    Offences against Good Taste


    · There was a flap about some Canadian tv outtakes turning up on the web, involving stupid jokes made by a certain Gord Martineau. He was sitting around the studio trying to be funny, etc. I happened to see mention of it at Accordion Guy. But in the related National Post story what strikes one is the new dialect that seems to encroach everywhere. A spokesman for the channel, Mr Hurlbut, does his stuff:

    Mr. Martineau was embarrassed about "something that may speak to a stellar career in broadcasting that might get a bit of smirch on it because he got crazy one day," Mr. Hurlbut said.
    Mr. Hurlbut said he did not think the comments would offend gay employees who might have heard them in the newsroom.
    "I think any employee, whether they be gay or not, is absolutely comfortable with Gord and the value structure within which we operate."
    "Speak to ... Whether he be ... Value structure". What is a value structure? I was astonished a few years back to see that city buses have a "fee structure" posted near the doors. Fares, they mean. I was hoping that this "speaks to" cant would perish. I think it has done so, and this just dates the person who uses it.


     — posted by P | at 7:49 PM | |

Friday, January 23, 2004

    Plus C'est le Même Meme II


    · Memes have a habit of reproducing all over. Sorry. Yes, "meme" ought to be used to mean "an impression people have that they cannot explain". You have a sort of opinion about a thing, but you can't where it comes from, or why you think that way. I think that's fair, isn't it? I once met someone who said, in fact, "I know I have these opinions; I just don't know why." H'mmmm. So I doubt you can convincingly label a thing a meme merely because you don't like it. It won't do to say 'the 'Disney is rubbish' meme", because, of course, Disney is rubbish, but also, anyone who has studied Warner Bros. cartoons knows that Disney is rubbish.

    I was taken to see Mary Poppins when I was five or so. Probably my first exposure the the Wonderful World of Disney. I thought it was the most disgusting, stupid nonsense I had ever seen. For a start, why does Poppins fly around with an umbrella? Is the umbrella holding her up? Or does it confer flying abilities? If she's magic, why can't she just fly without recourse to an umbrella? Next (as I recall from forty years ago), we see her taking all kinds of belongings from her bag, which is sitting on a table; the kids (who ought to have been sent to some fierce boarding school) look under the table to see if there is an inexhaustible supply of Ms Poppins's effects hidden there. It might be a trick, they reason. But even if there were, then it would mean Poppins had somehow sent her effects on ahead and had them secreted beneath the table, and had also arranged to have a hole made in the table, etc. In other words: the story made no sense. Ms Poppins and the kids were all, to me, much less realistic than Carroll's Alice or Alan Quatermain.

    Then you get the indefatigable Dick van Dyke doing the Cockney Steppin Fetchit routine. Let's draw a veil over that. (A professional actor, and he couldn't get within a hundred miles of the accent. How possible?)

    And finally there's a scene where everyone floats up to the ceiling if they have the right mood. Maybe I've got that wrong. I don't care.

    At that time I saw a great many films that made a lasting impresion on me. Gipsy, Annie, Get your Gun. I liked those movies.


     — posted by P | at 6:30 PM | |

Thursday, January 22, 2004

    Plus C'est le Même Meme


    · I suppose "meme" would be masculine. They must mean "mimema", "an imitation", which is neuter in gender, and neuters usually become masculine in French. (There is no Greek word "meme". "Meme" now means, "the sort of term people just make up and others exploit). Anyway, there's something interesting on Greggg Easterbrook's Easterblogg:

    Yet everyone now wants to consider Dean weird. What's at work may be that people are much more comfortable with "warm" politicians--Ronald Reagan, Bill Clinton--than with angry ones. [He cites the cases of G.W.H. Bush vs. Clinton, Gore vs. G.W. Bush] ... Whoever becomes the Democratic nominee, please keep in mind, warm-hearted sells, fury does not.
    There's something in this, but I'm not sure what. I think it has something to do with comfort: Homeland Security (and what's this "Homeland" stuff? Why not just "Domestic"?), job security, health care. Big concerns for people. People smile all the time, as a default facial expression. They take carloads of happy meds. And then look at popular culture: the sitcom (situtations are always funny, resolvable, and end up teaching a valuable lesson, instead of being miserable, desperate, and likely to adminster a big beating); movies (obviously Sauron, Hitler, and wicked drug barons must lose); etc. I don't want to go on. There's such a sociopathic optimism in the land that I hate to say more.


     — posted by P | at 6:28 PM | |

Wednesday, January 21, 2004

    Bibliotheca Scriptorum Vilium


    · How nice it must be to get one's hands on a copy of Hard Line, by Richard Perle. It is, unfortunately, out of print, but you can read a mini-review here from the Boston Globe (via "Ayn Clouter").

    It may seem unfair to mock novels written by politicians, but then novelists don't go around making foreign policy for big countries in their spare time, probably because they know that it's difficult to be good at any trade, let alone one you know little about.

    I believe Saddam Hussein couldn't resist writing a quasi-heroic romance novel that still awaits its translator.

    · A while back Colby Cosh had an interesting bit about chess and also the difficulty of Russian names; what form, etc. But like a lot of things, the name usage looks more difficult than it is. For one thing, you're always hearing people's names and patronymics. They're hard to miss or forget. People invariably intoduce people as Ivan Ivanovich or whatever, and every Russian book or movie I've ever seen (at least until recently) has the author's or participants' names written in the form "I.I. Whatever". Even editions of Pushkin always have on the title page "A.S. Pushkin". The second thing is that only a handful of first names are very common—Vladimir, Boris, Aleksandr, Andrei—so it's not hard to remember. All this has been changing over the last ten years, like a lot of things.


     — posted by P | at 4:59 PM | |

    · "Aube" is part of Rimbaud's "Illuminations", written sometime after 1872.


    J'ai embrassé l'aube d'été.

    Rien ne bougeait encore au front des palais. L'eau était morte. Les camps d'ombre ne quittaient pas la route du bois. J'ai marché, réveillant les haleines vives et tièdes, et les pierreries regardèrent, et les ailes se levèrent sans bruit.

    La première entreprise fut, dans le sentier déjà empli de frais et blâmes éclats, une fleur qui me dit son nom.

    Je ris au wasserfall blond qui s'échevela à travers les sapins : à la cime argentée je reconnus la déesse.

    Alors je levai un à un les voiles. Dans l'allée, en agitant les bras. Par la plaine, où je l'ai dénoncée au coq. À la grand'ville elle fuyait parmi les clochers et les dômes, et courant comme un mendiant sur les quais de marbre, je la chassais.

    En haut de la route, près d'un bois de lauriers, je l'ai entourée avec ses voiles amassés, et j'ai senti un peu son immense corps. L'aube et l'enfant tombèrent au bas du bois.

    Au réveil il était midi.

    Interesting, that use of the word "wasserfall". We use the word "combe", borrowed from Welsh, to mean a particular type of valley, and there are lots of others. I can't think of any similar reason for the poet to choose this word, other than for its sound. Maybe "chute d'eau" is just too big and noisy.


     — posted by P | at 3:17 PM | |

Saturday, January 17, 2004

    · My father was very upset at the death of Judy Garland. Retreated to basement; listened to records. I think I know why that was, though: she was a bit like some people in his family, the irrespressible, clean-cut country girls, etc., always saying "Golly!" and so on. So I think it was a whole way of life he was thinking about, not the music. (Musically, the man had no sense. To him, "God Save the Weasel" and "Pop goes the King" were the same tune. He could say a poem, and I've never heard anyone better, but he couldn't carry a tune to save himself.). It was around that time that I learned "You know, we French took Ratisbon", with the line: "And his chief beside / Smiling the boy fell dead."

    I've always thought "Smiling, the Boy Fell Dead" would be a good title for a memoir.


     — posted by P | at 8:04 PM | |

    Things my Father Muttered (I)


    Cast a cold eye

    On life, on death.

    Horseman pass by!


    That's Yeats, it turns out.

    What's it supposed to mean, anyway? Who is this horseman, and how is he in a position to look at life that way? And where's he going on this horse of his? I can only think he means the reader, the person who sees "40 Thousand Die in Earthquake" and goes on to read about Paul Martin with equal interest. I think it's a challenge to become, a bit like the unhappy man in "Russian Ark", something of a participant in history. Stop browsing and start breathing.


     — posted by P | at 6:24 PM | |

Friday, January 16, 2004

    Weird Thing


    · Years ago I ...

    Every day you should start a sentence like that, and see where it goes. Of coure, as is known, the secret to happiness is never to dwell on the past, but you're not happy, are you? So stop the masquerade at once and start recalling and refurbishing events from the past with a view to installing them in your Museum of Happy Memories! Here's one: I'm about seven, standing in a backyard in rural Missouri. There's no forest, just fields and scrubby trees. And off in the distance, about half a mile away, I can see some furry creature bowling along—a jackrabbit. My, they're fast! A white and grey animal, bigger than a cat but smaller than a dog. Kind of angry-looking, too.


     — posted by P | at 3:03 PM | |

    · A rather disturbing piece in Forward by Avraham Burg which can be classified with the End of the West or Decline of America sort of essay. Still, it deserves to be read, as the author was the Knesset speaker in 1999-2003. Things like this sometimes resemble exploratory surgery, where the object is merely to find out if there is anything wrong.

    The author says a lot of things that I think could be challenged, "A state lacking justice cannot survive." That's a good sentiment, but is it true? There have been unjust states that lasted centuries. I would bet it's almost common in history.

    I don't think he's correct in his final analysis, though, but what do I know? In general, I think some people make the following mistake: they view Israel exclusively as a recent historical development, as you would a policy of some government. Two objections to this are: a) Israel, or a land mass known as such, has been there for milliennia, and there have always been Jews living in it, or nearby; and b) a functioning state is a different thing from a UN policy, and cannot be dismantled without terrible cruelty and loss of life.


     — posted by P | at 2:30 PM | |

·
Subreactionary Notes.
Weblogs:
After Grog
The Ambler
Anfrax.ru
Angua's 1st Blog
Antic Muse
Nick Barlow
Tim Blair
Brain Not Found
Buscaraons
Chase me, ladies
Juan Cole
Colby Cosh
Andrew Coyne
Daily Kos
Daimnation!
Decembrist
Defensetech
Brad DeLong
Hossein Derakhshan
Catherine Duffy
Daniel Drezner
D-Squared
Eschaton (Atrios)
Fafblog!
Fistful of Euros
Flit
Head Heeb
Kieran Healy
Human Target
HypnoMoose
Instapundit
Ipse Dixit
Is That Legal?
Iraqi Agora
Johnny Jon Jon
Warren Kinsella
Kyklops
Letter from Gotham
Liberté-Cherie
James Lileks
Little Green Footballs
Looking Glass
Loser's Guide
Group Captain Mandrake
Maxspeak
Johan Norberg
Oblomovka
Oxblog
Persian Magic
Political Animal (K. Drum)
The Poor Man
Quasipundit
Raed in the Middle
Relapsed Catholic
Rittenhouse Review
Rufnkiddingme
Sadly, No!
Ikram Saeed
Samizdata
Shark Blog
Shot-by-Both-Sides
Shut Up You Fat·(Salam Pax)
Arthur Silber
Lt. Smash
Sari Stein
Sgt. Stryker
Andrew Sullivan
Tacitus
Talking Points Memo
Tbogg
Textism (Dean Allen)
Thrasymachus
Truth Laid Bear
Eve Tushnet
Unqualified Offerings
Useless Fools
USS Clueless
Vancouver Scrum
Volokh Conspiracy
War is Peace
Watch
Paul Wells
Wickens
Winds of Change
Wonkette
World o' Crap
Meryl Yourish

Useful Sites

Metric Conversion
Inflation Calculator
Currency Conversion
Canadian Encyclopedia
FBI's Top Ten
Flight View
King James Bible

Visit the Subbasement
Annals of Public Neurosis, etc.

Archives:
current

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Site Meter

Leave a message.

Email me
Search Google:
 

More Sites:



The Subbasement


Bibliography


  Old Books
... without the dust

 

 


· Ors, Eugenio d', 1882-1954. Oceanografia del tedio; Historias de las esparragueras. Madrid: Calpe, 1921.

Eugenio d'Ors was born in Barcelona in 1881, studied law and philosophy, became an art critic and essayist, and gradually developed his own peculiar ideas, exemplified in this delightful, short work, which he wrote in Spanish (rather than Catalan) around 1919. The Spanish Civil War caught him in Paris, where he remained for the duration. Though not an activist, he would have been unwelcome at home because of his Catalan sympathies.

The author, or a character referred to throughout as "Autor", opens his story by explaining that his doctor had instructed him, for the sake of his health, to do absolutely nothing. He's not even alowed to think about anything. "Ni un movimiento, ni un pensamiento!", the doctor says. He therefore spends all his time in a lawn chair looking at clouds, wondering about scents that waft past, in short, doing nothing. And yet everything, in a way. It's a wonderful story about inaction, just the sort of thing for someone who spends a lot of time looking at weblogs.

· Tabori, Paul. The Natural Science of Stupidity. Philadelphia: Chilton Co., 1959.

The author, who was born in 1908, discusses stupidity. He explains how the Yap people of the Pilau Islands use stone disks, some of them the size of millstones, as currency. The largest stones are more like real estate: you could buy one, and your wealth would be ensured. Then he goes on about King Solomon's mines, which he connects with this passage in Kings I, 9.

He has a lot to say about popular beliefs, crazes, and things. It's a shame he wrote long before conspiracy theories really came into their own.


   
  

  Georges Duhamel
Select Bibliography

 

 


Duhamel, Georges, Le desert de Bièvres. Paris: Mercure de France, 1930.

—, Biographie de mes fantômes, 1901-1906. Paris: P. Hartmann, 1944.

—, Chroniques des Pasquier. Paris: Mercure de France, 1933-

—, Essai sur le roman. Paris: M. Lesage, 1925.

—, Fables de mon jardin, suivi de Mon royaume. Paris: Mercure de France, 1961.

—, Israël, clef de l'Orient. Paris: Mercure de France, 1957.

—, Les plaisirs et les jeux, mémoires du cuib et du tioup. Paris: Mercure de France, 1946.

—, Récits des temps de guerre. Paris: Mercure de France, 1949.

—, Souvenirs de la vie du paradis. Paris: Mercure de France, 1906.


   
  

Annals of Public Neurosis


  Peace Tricks
April 2002

 

 


"The month-long standoff at Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's Ramallah compound looked to be nearing its conclusion as U.S. and British security experts arrived in the region to implement a U.S.-brokered plan."
—CNN, April 29, 2002.

The current talks between the U.S. and everyone else seem to be even more impenetrable than usual, probably because it's difficult to imagine what they might possibly have to talk about. Surely they have exhausted every topic, scoured every useless path many times over, checked and re-checked even the most unpromising approaches? In which case these talks most closely resemble a kind of obsessive-compulsive behaviour, enacted in the curious privacy of public life. We've no idea what they're saying, or what they really want, but we get daily, even hourly reports of this activity of theirs. We don't get the details, or even the gist, of what was discussed, but we are assured that some talking is going on, and that there will be more talking later.

Patients who show signs of obsessive-compulsive behaviour typically find themselves incapable of getting important things done—or even of confronting their most pressing problems. They therefore busy themselves with something they can do effectively, often to the exclusion of all else. Tidying up the bus shelter, making absolutely sure they take x number of steps before opening the front door, and so on. Obviously, the significance of the activities performed can vary: some things are a fairly useful by-product of otherwise misdirected energies; others are of rather doubtful value, at least to the secular world. So it is with political discussions and "U.S.-brokered" peace plans. Some do produce unusual fruit, though not always the expected one, while others have a more magical quality, as if the participants were involved in some sort of Hermetic, alchemical work designed to bring about peace by causing it to be acted out in a symbolic drama.


   
  

Almost a Complete Thought


 

 

 


· Watching a movie. Wait! Is the guy screwing up my correct view of things? Or was my view untenable to begin with? Certainly he can point to his successful career as proof of some rectitude. But maybe he's so clever, so cunning, that he succeeds in the teeth of madness. A prosaic blend of fantasy and reality!


· I was watching some crime show. The crime has already been committed. Snazzy men and women arrive at the crime scene and take swabs, wear rubber gloves, pose in their outfits. Wait, is this a fashion show? Meanwhile ... let's look at this corpse really closely. Dear me. Ugh, can we stop looking at that for a bit? It's a pretty horrible crime. And so messy!

"Look, Lt. I've been examining some filth and discovered who the 'perp' is."

"Good. Let us now set our jaws grimly."


· I read somewhere that when you are watching TV, your brain is less active than when you are asleep. I find this bizarre, because I often dream that I'm watching TV.


· Most movies are much better with the sound off, so you can make up your own, more entertaining dialogue. Also, it starts to get intriguing. You end up wondering what's going to happen next, because all sorts of inexplicable things keep happening.


   
  

Stories


  A Story
Subtitle

 

 


It's too bad. If I could think of a story offhand, I would write it in this space; that's what you would be reading. Instead, there is only this inconsequential, self-regarding excuse for not being able to come up with anything.

Of course, I think the reader is doing very well so far. Remarkably well. I thing the reader comes out of this whole thing smelling like a rose. He has done his job. No, the reader is above reproach. His record is unblemished. Some readers even go that extra step and look for coded messages in the few paragraphs made available to them. That shows resourcefulness, valour — I think.


   
  

  Reveille
A Miniature Fascist Dictator

 

 


There was a miniature Fascist dictator in the departure lounge of the airport, Ted noticed. About four feet high, eighty pounds, sallow complexion, neatly trimmed black moustache, wearing a khaki uniform of some kind.

Was he planning a small Putsch? A Measure? What pint-sized dreams of conquest did he have? "Our National party is stronger - we are in no way diminished," he may have imagined himself saying. "Now, if I say to you that our Party's goal is nothing less than to revendicate that which we have lost, that which is historically our due; to reclaim our patrimony ..." Is that what was going on in his head? Was he on his way somewhere, or coming from somewhere? Going into exile, or returning from it? Escaping? Seeking?

Ted decided to follow him until he could come up with some further course of action. But the man wasn't really doing anything. Just wandering around with a container of coffee, keeping an eye on the brown satchel and shopping bags he had left on one of the naugahyde-and-aluminium benches. He paused in front of the windows that looked onto the airfield. His nostrils flared at the sight of massed passenger aircraft. Then he sauntered over to the other side of the lounge and studied some posters. Ted pretended to inspect a model lobster trap in a display case nearby.

They toured the lounge in stages and, even before the small man glanced back at him, Ted was already lost in thought beneath an departure-and-arrivals screen. "Am I supposed to do something?" he wondered. "Is there some history going on here, somewhere?" But how would one know?

Ted then discreetly followed him back to the coffee bar. Apparently he wanted another coffee. There were several customers before them, and in the time it took for them to be served, Ted was almost able to identify the small man's scent: LancĂ´me for Men? His choice of coffee, too, was unusual, a decaffeinated Ethiopian flavour. He went back to his original bench. Ted loitered just behind him, undecided. Unprepared. Shall I say something? What's he doing?

Looking at his ticket again.

Sipping his coffee, sucking a great deal of air between pursed lips just over the steaming surface of the coffee. Too hot.

Consulting the contents of his satchel once again, just to verify that he had everything he would need for his trip. Ted, peering over his shoulder, caught sight of a volume of Pablo Neruda, Jane Eyre, and a stuffed toy rabbit.

Putting his coffee down, digging with both hands in one of the shopping bags, the one that had some sort of environmentalist logo on it. Nous recyclons!

Recovering a pair of sunglasses. Putting them on! Expensive ones!

"Excuse me - okay if I sit down?"

"Eh? Oh, please. Yes, yes - you are quite welcome."

Ted sat down wearily. "I've been travelling all day, I hope you don't mind."

The other nodded rapidly. "It is very tiresome, all this travelling," he said. "I myself have been up since very early, making connecting flights. And still my day is not over."

Ted seized the thing roundly. "What sort of business are you in, if it's no harm to ask?"

"I am a consultant. Specialising in pharmaceutical trade." The little dictator removed his sunglasses and began to polish them on his handkerchief.

Well, at least he wasn't a jack-booted thug!

"I am not used to talking to fewer than five thousand people at a time", he continued, "for fear of being misunderstood. However, I shall make a beginning.

"It is horrifying to think of the consequences of chance. One man begins a great career as an officer in the European Theatre; another, no less gifted, has his head blown off as soon as he steps out of the landing craft. Why does that happen? Who is to blame? Who will account for it?"

Here the little man swigged his coffee. Ted noted that his hair, seemingly dark brown, was really an artificial boot-brown colour. Ted formed a reply: "Well, I suppose it would depend how you look - "

But the other man was not to be denied: "It is no accident that the corporate hegemony of a small group of - "

Ted sprang into action. More on that next week.


   
  

  Fun at Home
A Pious Memory

 

 


When Chris heard God had invited Himself to the party, he thought it was all over. There was probably no getting around it, though. "What they do on tv", said Bill, "is invite a Catholic priest, a Rabbi, and a minister as well. To sort of get their collective spin on it."

"But this isn't a tv show", said Chris, "it's a party. A little get-together for a bunch of friends, some of whom are leaving in a couple weeks. And anyway, that approach always comes off as a tired, unfunny joke, predictable, you know...I don't know why everyone acts as if tv meant something."

"Yeah. I had this dream I was watching tv last night. But then I realised dreams are kind of like tv, only not as good. We'd better go to the liquor store."

"Just let me get my coat."

God phoned around 8:00 to say He would be along soon. "Want me to bring anything?" he asked.

"Just yourself, man," said Chris. People always brought too much junk. There was always a surplus of snack-food bags and dip the next day.

"Okay", said God. "After all, I am That Am, you know."

People started turning up a little later:

"Sheila!" said Chris, greeting one of his guests, "So you managed to find the address."

"Yeah - sorry I'm late, but - "

"No problem. So, are you excited about your new job?"

"Yes, it's - "

"Dirk!" said Chris, greeting another guest, "Glad you could make it, are you excited about the new job?"

"Well - it's kind of not what I'm looking for, but it's in the right area. And I didn't want to have to move to - "

"And your girlfriend? Is she ...?"

"In Norway." And he began to look as if he would like to scowl, but instead turned to the consuming business of installing some cans of beer in the fridge. Other people skulked around the kitchen. A party had erupted.

A little later Chris noticed God levelling a tequila shot and saying, "I'm gonna have a wicked case of the guilts tomorrow."

God put cucumber slices over his eyes and said, "Look at Me. I am become weird."

Around 2:00 am God hooked up His guitar and started playing "Stairway to Heaven" really loud. Most of the people who had fallen asleep woke up and staggered back to the party. He played pretty well. Then He segued into "Born to be Wild", which He played rather better. The sheer noise was an audial colossus, making the dishes tremble even in the kitchen.

"Get Him out of here, the man's an animal," said Bill.

Chris looked at God from the door into the kitchen. "Oh, I don't know. I don't think he's going to do anything too serious."

"No, I mean the noise. The neighbours'll be like - "

"Any problem?" asked God. He was coming to get some more wine. Since He was no longer playing the guitar there didn't seem to by any need to admonish Him.

A little later something happened. But was that before or after the police dropped by? And later still, God was found lying in the driveway. They carried Him into a bedroom.

Is He ok?

Did He hurt himself?

In the morning they opened the bedroom door to find He had gone.

"Now what do we do?" asked Chris.


   
  

  At the —
History of Painting

 

 


I am confronted with a roomful of wild canvases, one every three feet or so. I should like to be able to make something of them, of each one, I am eager to look and see. I so want this to be a happy occasion, matching the success of my haircut, clean shirt, and the perfectly-lit, high- ceilinged gallery in which I find myself. The first work is a smear of toothpaste on a background of tar. Okay, I'll come back to it. The next one is a painting of a doll with severe injuries. I would rather not look at that for too long. Next: a smear of something on an untreated canvas. This is interesting. What is that stuff? Has it been melted on? Next: a big smear on a big canvas. It is faintly s-shaped, like a meandering river of industrial waste through an indifferent wilderness. I suspect that polysaccharides have contributed to the very exciting texture. But once again we are confronted with the work.

A man behind me starts explaining the historical phonology of Tibetan, making it all a bit clearer by citing some examples from Proto-Tibeto-Burman, and a few moments later I am smoking a cigarette outside somewhere.


   
  

  Fifty Toyes
A Story for Children

 

 


Before B. retired to his room for the rest of his life, people kept coming up to him and complaining, "I've run out of ideas. I don't know what to think about any more," and he would reply, "How can I help? Why would you think I could help? I haven't had a thought in years. I have stared into space, chatted with people I supposedly know, watched tv, read weekly news magazines. I've watched grown men play with each other as a form of entertainment. I haven't really had to think. Moreover, I am retiring now because of a general lack of benevolence. Also, I can't find my umbrella, which makes my going out a non-starter, kind of. I may set fire to a bundle of words and pour a can of emotions over them later, so - drop in whenever. I would enjoy the company. You know." All this to forestall the observation that he was, himself, lazy and indifferent, or was merely hiding from something. Of course he had books and a tv, so what harm could there be in not going anywhere? However, reasonable people can no longer hope to get very far by argumentation that appeals to reason, since they are probably arguing with unreasonable people, as statistics can be made to show. And as he thought this, it occurred to him: compiling statistics was one of the innumerable things he could do now, in the freedom of his room.


   
  

  Anne of Green Gables
A Part of Our Heritage

 

 


Anne of Green Gables. Anne of Green Gables. Anne of Green Gables. Do people never tire of that? Anne of Green Gables. Based on the novel Anne of Green Gables. I assume there was such a person, once: Anne of Green Gables. I sort of wondered about her after I had heard the name for, oh, the ten thousandth time. I read somewhere that "Anne of Green Gables is a trademark and a Canadian official mark of the Anne of Green Gables Licensing Authority Inc." So you see? If you were thinking of calling your novel Anne of Green Gables, don't. You understand why that would be wrong, don't you? People would accuse you of trying to "cash in", so to speak, and that would tend to cast a mercenary shadow over the spirit of Anne of Green Gables. The argument of the novel Anne of Green Gables is as follows: some people want to adopt a boy who can help out on the farm; they are disappointed when they get a girl instead. This girl is Anne Shirley, later to be known as Anne of Green Gables and, later still, as a trademark and a Canadian official mark of the Anne of Green Gables Licensing Authority Inc. She has red hair and freckles, she is irrepressible, and she proves to be just as good as any boy, in fact much, much better. This bodes well for the whole community. That's the whole plot. Probably quicker to identify it by its children's literature motif number.

The book could have been called Anne of Green Gables Makes Her Bones, but that makes for rather a long title. It could have been more interesting, though: Anne would be the village drunk, stealing other women's menfolk, dealing drugs, and coming home in the morning to threaten her foster parents with the .22 and demand money. Eventually she gets an important job in the government through some people she used to party with. But this is not what happens in Anne of Green Gables. Nowhere do you hear of her being an alcoholic, or having her neglected children taken into charge, or her endless squabbles with social services, or her many appearances in court accompanied by a different leering car thief each time. None of that appears in the novel Anne of Green Gables, or in any of the other canonical Anne books. Why is that?


   
  
· Here you'll find rather more irrelevant mini essays, roughly categorized somehow. I wish I could be more clear.

· Bibliographical Notes
— Old Books
— Duhamel Bibliography
· Annals of Public Neurosis
— Peace Tricks
· Almost a Complete Thought
· Stories
— Reveille
— Fun at Home
— A Story
— At the —
— A Story for Children
— Anne of Green Gables
  Back to Top

The contents and design of this page are entirely homemade.
I copied a few things from way better pages of course.