Subtrahend


Sunday, December 28, 2003

    Canada's New PM Very Busy


    · If you visit Paul Martin's weblog ("Paul's Blog"), you'll see that he hasn't been wasting valuable work time playing around at the computer. The latest entry is from October 19th. In general, there's not a lot there.

    It's not a bad idea for politicians to have a website, at least, but this seems a bit informal, all this "Personal Paul", "Paul in the Media", "Where Paul Stands". It's Land O' Paul. He should rein it in before it gets out of hand: PaulNotes. PaulPicks. PaulRants. Etc.

    Whatever you do, don't confuse his site with this apparently unrelated site.


     — posted by P | at 11:04 PM | |

    Some Trouble?


    · According to this story in The Mirror, President Bush and PM Blair have not been getting on so well:

    The two leaders have fallen out over plans for the reconstruction of the country and the heavy-handed action of American troops against the civilian population.

    And the rift has been deepened by a Washington ban on a proposed morale-boosting visit by the PM to British troops in Iraq during the Christmas holiday.

    ...

    Mr Blair and Mr Bush have had at least three phone conversations during the past seven days which Whitehall officials described as "increasingly terse".

    How did Whitehall officials come to be saying that? They don't have to say anything, surely. If the business of the ban on a Christmas visit by Blair is true, it's, well, awfully strange. (Via Suburbanguerrilla)


     — posted by P | at 9:02 PM | |

    In and Out of Banach Spaces


    · The noted scientist Dr. K. explains that there are probably a thousand planets out there which could probably sustain life, probably, but probably these life-forms would probably not be like us.
    " ... probably drivel and probably ignorant nonsense"
    That is probably drivel and probably ignorant nonsense, because probably they would be just like us in every respect. And probably they would send us a note saying they were going to be dropping by soon and would we be in? And they would land, and we could take them around to see things—our monuments, our parks—and then have them back for some wine and cheese. We would probably have little to say to each other, however, and everyone would sit around grinning uneasily. Finally it would be time for them to be getting back, and we would go out and admire their space ships. "Oh," they would say, "but you guys probably have much better space ships!" And we would say, "Oh no, not at all. We don't really do much travelling these days. Although we have been to the moon." "The moon?" they would say, "Oh, you mean—your moon. Oh yes. Sure. Why gad about when you've a lovely planet right here?" And they would look around appreciatively. And we would all probably shuffle our feet and finally they would get into their space ships, and we would wave to them and say "Safe home! Thanks again for coming all this way!" And they would say, over the roar of their engines, "No, no—thank you for having us! And if you're ever out our way—come by! You know where we are now!" "Yes, yes", we would say, "absolutely!" "Promise?!" "Of course!!" And we would mean it, too—we would probably enjoy going out there on a visit. But what's the point?


     — posted by P | at 4:51 PM | |

    The "Future" will be in "Quotation Marks"


    · Fred Q. was an actor whom you will have seen in comparatively small roles on late night television. Typically he is breaking into an office after hours looking for something. He goes over to the filing cabinet, puts the flashlight in his teeth to facilitate his search.
    "Within seconds he draws the necessary folder from the cabinet."
    Within seconds he draws the necessary folder from the cabinet. The third sheet of paper in it tells him all he needs to know: so it was a set-up all along! McQaid was just playing for time and had Schaeffer killed to make it look like an accident.

    Suddenly the lights go on. And what do we see?

    Fred Q. was in several musical comedies: he was the irrepressible but less attractive friend of the romantic lead who consoles the girl when she thinks she has been rejected. He never seems to have a girlfriend, though, until the very end of the movie, when he starts holding hands with the irrepressible but less attractive friend of the romantic lead's girlfriend.

    But Fred Q. had a series on television for a while: he is the bemused father of some children. He has a career, one of those undemanding jobs where you spend most of your time coming home from the office with a briefcase. Sometimes he breakfasts at home, and then sets out for the office, but only if some issue involving his family requires it.

    Similarly, Fred Q. played the father of a problematic family in a number of later films: he often feels harassed and lacking in support in these instances; he wants a peaceful life with his hobbies, or he wants simply to enjoy his vacation without interference. To this end he sometimes retreats to his "den", or goes out to do some "yard work". He is sometimes seen to take a drink, usually a cocktail, as the social context may dictate, but there is no reason to suppose that he self-medicates with alcohol when alone. Undeniably, Fred Q.'s emotional life is rather thin. He is disinclined to verbalize, however, preferring to make light of his lack of affective connection through harmless-seeming "quips" and witty comeback-making behaviour.

    The lights go on without warning. Fred Q. freezes, and then begins to turn around slowly. He has learned something valuable here, but the once again the game is up, at least for now. He raises his hands and hopes for courage, ideas, luck, but best of all: a mistake by his enemies.


     — posted by P | at 12:28 PM | |

Saturday, December 20, 2003

    · Phraseology is interesting. A Russian friend pointed out that the English expression "as hungry as a bear" sounded strange; in Russian it's "as hungry as a wolf". But one thing about bears is that they hibernate, and thus, etc. What about "as healthy as"? In Irish it's "chomh folláin le bradán", "as healthy as a salmon". Strange.


     — posted by P | at 9:31 PM | |

    · Êíèãà. Just trying to see if this works. And it does not.

    Bernarr Macfadden (1868-1955) was the author of Macfadden's Encyclopedia of Physical Culture, (New York, 1911-12), in five volumes. The Physical Culture Publishing Company was located at the Flatiron Building; but according to the frontispiece, the company had its HQ in a "magnificent building, with its superb equipment, representing an investment of a quarter of one million dollars" at Grand Boulevard and 42nd St., Chicago. This is interesting. At that time there was a geat deal of scope for health gurus, who would usually turn yellow and die when they were 63 or so.


     — posted by P | at 8:10 PM | |

Wednesday, December 17, 2003

    · Not a great deal was said about the death of Robert Stanfield. Of course, I only watch "The Space Channel", but I noticied that everyone kept commenting on his "decency", as if that were an eccentricity in a politician. As if they might have been saying, "And did you know he was also a great go player? Yes! Eight-Dan Stan, we used to call him." I'm sure more will be said later on.


     — posted by P | at 7:39 PM | |

    · A scholarly-type blog writer has just written the following: "I just finished writing up a 500-word entry ..." That's good. I prefer "writing-up"; it has a more sideburns 'n' windbreaker feel to it, but that's good, nevertheless. Later in the same entry he uses the expression nihil obstat, and discreetly links it to a dictionary. He knows his readers just might be challenged there. "I'm using this term which you prolly don't know, so here's the definition—but not in parentheses or something. That would be too obvious, and you might feel insulted." Who is he writing for? People who will follow the argument but not get the vocabulary? Is that wise?

    Another interesting bit from a blogoscholar; this time from Samizdata (I enjoy the pun: samizdat, you know, self-published information, for which Russians would have spent years in labour camp, but which we laughingly offer on our beautiful website, but in the form of outright, real, true-blue, data):

    This question of which was worse, Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia, is one that fascinates me. My gut feeling is that there was indeed something an order of magnitude worse about Nazi Germany, in terms of the moral inexcusability of the people who did it rather than in terms of the destructive results - which were much of a muchness when you add it up, as Little says. Russia, you feel, or at any rate I do, was engulfed in a great wave of ideologically induced stupidity and destructive passion. They knew no better, poor fools. (I feel rather the same way about the Islamo-fascists now.) Germany, on the other hand, did know better, but went bad on purpose. Germany chose evil.

    Granted, that is an extreme collectivist oversimplification of what was still a vast and vastly messy assemblage of individual decisions, nothing like all of which were as evil as the worst of them. Nevertheless, to a far greater degree than the Russians, the Germans chose, collectively, all in one conversation - so to speak, to go bad.

    So there you have it. Nothing much to worry about here. The poor fools, those Russians. Probably, being poor fools, they didn't suffer as much, either. You know. What can you expect? It's Chinatown, man. Better the devil you don't know, I guess.

    Intellectuals used to sometimes say: "But we didn't know ...!" And Russians would say: "You didn't want to know."

    Just look back at what he is saying. Tell me if I am wrong or if I misread him: Nazis were worse because you can't excuse them. We don't expect much from Russians. Don't you expect something a bit more post-adolescent from a whole collective of intellectuals?


     — posted by P | at 6:55 PM | |

    · The thing about Spider-Man is he's not very much like a spider, really. He doesn't look remotely spider-like. Unlike a spider, he has a job and (as far as I know) doesn't suck the juices out of flies for nourishment. He has "spider-strength", but is strength something you associate with spiders? "Why look at that man, he's as strong as a spider." Do people say that? They might say, "He's as revolting as a spider." Next, he can walk up walls. I don't think spiders could do that if they were wearing boots and gloves, though. Well, let's leave that. The big spider-like thing he does is fire webbing at things. But he can do this because he has an engineered device that he has made in his basement. It's not some talent he got from the radioactive spider-bite. Furthermore, spiders do not, at least on this continent, travel by firing webbing at remote objects and swinging therefrom like Tarzan.

    No, the only reason he is Spider-Man man is because he says he is and runs around at night wearing a spider-suit. He could just as well run around claiming to be a pirate. Why is this?

    Well, look at his personal life (and is there any other kind?) He can't get along with his boss, yet won't seek another job. He worries about his aunt, but apparently won't feed her—you've seen the pictures, she's obviously been living on water and crackers for years. He has no friends, and wouldn't know how to amuse them if he had. And, finally, his "girlfriend" is a problem of some kind, rather than a delight. That's because everything is a problem for him. There is no aspect of his life that is not an insoluble problem. Yet are these problems truly insoluble? He hasn't had time to work on that, because he's too busy devoting himself to the really important business of pretending to be a spider.

    So the story of Spider-Man is really the story of a man who prefers a fantasy life, interfering with law-enforcement, instead of trying to help himself or those around him.


     — posted by P | at 12:38 AM | |

Tuesday, December 16, 2003

    · I can remember when VCRs came out, one of the selling points was that you could record what was on tv. That way, in case the rest of the world forgot what was on tv, at least you'd have this recording. Posterity would be able to squint at all these flickering images of Man about the House and This Hour has 22 Unfunny Writers and so on. But what I need is a machine that would detect entertainment somewhere out there and alert me to it. After you're done coursing hounds or studying the arpeggione, it's nice to watch something amusing. However, I notice that some channels show the same thing all day long, as if they don't expect their audience to have any short-term memory. Yesterday I was watching the same episode of Murder, She Wrote that I seem to have seen many times, and it occurred to me that the network must be trying to send me a message. That's what you would think, if someone persisted in sending you the same signal over and over again. You'd think, "Maybe this means something! Maybe they're trapped, and this is their only way of communicating with the outside world." Or maybe it only means something to a select few, who are even now streaming toward their undisclosed locations. The rest of us are just going to be vapourized right after Murder, She Wrote.

    If you get a DVD player, then you can watch all this junk about the movie you're watching. That's meta-entertainment!


     — posted by P | at 11:48 PM | |

·
Subreactionary Notes.
Weblogs:
After Grog
The Ambler
Anfrax.ru
Angua's 1st Blog
Antic Muse
Nick Barlow
Tim Blair
Brain Not Found
Buscaraons
Chase me, ladies
Juan Cole
Colby Cosh
Andrew Coyne
Daily Kos
Daimnation!
Decembrist
Defensetech
Brad DeLong
Hossein Derakhshan
Catherine Duffy
Daniel Drezner
D-Squared
Eschaton (Atrios)
Fafblog!
Fistful of Euros
Flit
Head Heeb
Kieran Healy
Human Target
HypnoMoose
Instapundit
Ipse Dixit
Is That Legal?
Iraqi Agora
Johnny Jon Jon
Warren Kinsella
Kyklops
Letter from Gotham
Liberté-Cherie
James Lileks
Little Green Footballs
Looking Glass
Loser's Guide
Group Captain Mandrake
Maxspeak
Johan Norberg
Oblomovka
Oxblog
Persian Magic
Political Animal (K. Drum)
The Poor Man
Quasipundit
Raed in the Middle
Relapsed Catholic
Rittenhouse Review
Rufnkiddingme
Sadly, No!
Ikram Saeed
Samizdata
Shark Blog
Shot-by-Both-Sides
Shut Up You Fat·(Salam Pax)
Arthur Silber
Lt. Smash
Sari Stein
Sgt. Stryker
Andrew Sullivan
Tacitus
Talking Points Memo
Tbogg
Textism (Dean Allen)
Thrasymachus
Truth Laid Bear
Eve Tushnet
Unqualified Offerings
Useless Fools
USS Clueless
Vancouver Scrum
Volokh Conspiracy
War is Peace
Watch
Paul Wells
Wickens
Winds of Change
Wonkette
World o' Crap
Meryl Yourish

Useful Sites

Metric Conversion
Inflation Calculator
Currency Conversion
Canadian Encyclopedia
FBI's Top Ten
Flight View
King James Bible

Visit the Subbasement
Annals of Public Neurosis, etc.

Archives:
current

Powered by Blogger

Weblog Commenting and Trackback by HaloScan.com

Site Meter

Leave a message.

Email me
Search Google:
 

More Sites:



The Subbasement


Bibliography


  Old Books
... without the dust

 

 


· Ors, Eugenio d', 1882-1954. Oceanografia del tedio; Historias de las esparragueras. Madrid: Calpe, 1921.

Eugenio d'Ors was born in Barcelona in 1881, studied law and philosophy, became an art critic and essayist, and gradually developed his own peculiar ideas, exemplified in this delightful, short work, which he wrote in Spanish (rather than Catalan) around 1919. The Spanish Civil War caught him in Paris, where he remained for the duration. Though not an activist, he would have been unwelcome at home because of his Catalan sympathies.

The author, or a character referred to throughout as "Autor", opens his story by explaining that his doctor had instructed him, for the sake of his health, to do absolutely nothing. He's not even alowed to think about anything. "Ni un movimiento, ni un pensamiento!", the doctor says. He therefore spends all his time in a lawn chair looking at clouds, wondering about scents that waft past, in short, doing nothing. And yet everything, in a way. It's a wonderful story about inaction, just the sort of thing for someone who spends a lot of time looking at weblogs.

· Tabori, Paul. The Natural Science of Stupidity. Philadelphia: Chilton Co., 1959.

The author, who was born in 1908, discusses stupidity. He explains how the Yap people of the Pilau Islands use stone disks, some of them the size of millstones, as currency. The largest stones are more like real estate: you could buy one, and your wealth would be ensured. Then he goes on about King Solomon's mines, which he connects with this passage in Kings I, 9.

He has a lot to say about popular beliefs, crazes, and things. It's a shame he wrote long before conspiracy theories really came into their own.


   
  

  Georges Duhamel
Select Bibliography

 

 


Duhamel, Georges, Le desert de Bièvres. Paris: Mercure de France, 1930.

—, Biographie de mes fantômes, 1901-1906. Paris: P. Hartmann, 1944.

—, Chroniques des Pasquier. Paris: Mercure de France, 1933-

—, Essai sur le roman. Paris: M. Lesage, 1925.

—, Fables de mon jardin, suivi de Mon royaume. Paris: Mercure de France, 1961.

—, Israël, clef de l'Orient. Paris: Mercure de France, 1957.

—, Les plaisirs et les jeux, mémoires du cuib et du tioup. Paris: Mercure de France, 1946.

—, Récits des temps de guerre. Paris: Mercure de France, 1949.

—, Souvenirs de la vie du paradis. Paris: Mercure de France, 1906.


   
  

Annals of Public Neurosis


  Peace Tricks
April 2002

 

 


"The month-long standoff at Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat's Ramallah compound looked to be nearing its conclusion as U.S. and British security experts arrived in the region to implement a U.S.-brokered plan."
—CNN, April 29, 2002.

The current talks between the U.S. and everyone else seem to be even more impenetrable than usual, probably because it's difficult to imagine what they might possibly have to talk about. Surely they have exhausted every topic, scoured every useless path many times over, checked and re-checked even the most unpromising approaches? In which case these talks most closely resemble a kind of obsessive-compulsive behaviour, enacted in the curious privacy of public life. We've no idea what they're saying, or what they really want, but we get daily, even hourly reports of this activity of theirs. We don't get the details, or even the gist, of what was discussed, but we are assured that some talking is going on, and that there will be more talking later.

Patients who show signs of obsessive-compulsive behaviour typically find themselves incapable of getting important things done—or even of confronting their most pressing problems. They therefore busy themselves with something they can do effectively, often to the exclusion of all else. Tidying up the bus shelter, making absolutely sure they take x number of steps before opening the front door, and so on. Obviously, the significance of the activities performed can vary: some things are a fairly useful by-product of otherwise misdirected energies; others are of rather doubtful value, at least to the secular world. So it is with political discussions and "U.S.-brokered" peace plans. Some do produce unusual fruit, though not always the expected one, while others have a more magical quality, as if the participants were involved in some sort of Hermetic, alchemical work designed to bring about peace by causing it to be acted out in a symbolic drama.


   
  

Almost a Complete Thought


 

 

 


· Watching a movie. Wait! Is the guy screwing up my correct view of things? Or was my view untenable to begin with? Certainly he can point to his successful career as proof of some rectitude. But maybe he's so clever, so cunning, that he succeeds in the teeth of madness. A prosaic blend of fantasy and reality!


· I was watching some crime show. The crime has already been committed. Snazzy men and women arrive at the crime scene and take swabs, wear rubber gloves, pose in their outfits. Wait, is this a fashion show? Meanwhile ... let's look at this corpse really closely. Dear me. Ugh, can we stop looking at that for a bit? It's a pretty horrible crime. And so messy!

"Look, Lt. I've been examining some filth and discovered who the 'perp' is."

"Good. Let us now set our jaws grimly."


· I read somewhere that when you are watching TV, your brain is less active than when you are asleep. I find this bizarre, because I often dream that I'm watching TV.


· Most movies are much better with the sound off, so you can make up your own, more entertaining dialogue. Also, it starts to get intriguing. You end up wondering what's going to happen next, because all sorts of inexplicable things keep happening.


   
  

Stories


  A Story
Subtitle

 

 


It's too bad. If I could think of a story offhand, I would write it in this space; that's what you would be reading. Instead, there is only this inconsequential, self-regarding excuse for not being able to come up with anything.

Of course, I think the reader is doing very well so far. Remarkably well. I thing the reader comes out of this whole thing smelling like a rose. He has done his job. No, the reader is above reproach. His record is unblemished. Some readers even go that extra step and look for coded messages in the few paragraphs made available to them. That shows resourcefulness, valour — I think.


   
  

  Reveille
A Miniature Fascist Dictator

 

 


There was a miniature Fascist dictator in the departure lounge of the airport, Ted noticed. About four feet high, eighty pounds, sallow complexion, neatly trimmed black moustache, wearing a khaki uniform of some kind.

Was he planning a small Putsch? A Measure? What pint-sized dreams of conquest did he have? "Our National party is stronger - we are in no way diminished," he may have imagined himself saying. "Now, if I say to you that our Party's goal is nothing less than to revendicate that which we have lost, that which is historically our due; to reclaim our patrimony ..." Is that what was going on in his head? Was he on his way somewhere, or coming from somewhere? Going into exile, or returning from it? Escaping? Seeking?

Ted decided to follow him until he could come up with some further course of action. But the man wasn't really doing anything. Just wandering around with a container of coffee, keeping an eye on the brown satchel and shopping bags he had left on one of the naugahyde-and-aluminium benches. He paused in front of the windows that looked onto the airfield. His nostrils flared at the sight of massed passenger aircraft. Then he sauntered over to the other side of the lounge and studied some posters. Ted pretended to inspect a model lobster trap in a display case nearby.

They toured the lounge in stages and, even before the small man glanced back at him, Ted was already lost in thought beneath an departure-and-arrivals screen. "Am I supposed to do something?" he wondered. "Is there some history going on here, somewhere?" But how would one know?

Ted then discreetly followed him back to the coffee bar. Apparently he wanted another coffee. There were several customers before them, and in the time it took for them to be served, Ted was almost able to identify the small man's scent: Lancôme for Men? His choice of coffee, too, was unusual, a decaffeinated Ethiopian flavour. He went back to his original bench. Ted loitered just behind him, undecided. Unprepared. Shall I say something? What's he doing?

Looking at his ticket again.

Sipping his coffee, sucking a great deal of air between pursed lips just over the steaming surface of the coffee. Too hot.

Consulting the contents of his satchel once again, just to verify that he had everything he would need for his trip. Ted, peering over his shoulder, caught sight of a volume of Pablo Neruda, Jane Eyre, and a stuffed toy rabbit.

Putting his coffee down, digging with both hands in one of the shopping bags, the one that had some sort of environmentalist logo on it. Nous recyclons!

Recovering a pair of sunglasses. Putting them on! Expensive ones!

"Excuse me - okay if I sit down?"

"Eh? Oh, please. Yes, yes - you are quite welcome."

Ted sat down wearily. "I've been travelling all day, I hope you don't mind."

The other nodded rapidly. "It is very tiresome, all this travelling," he said. "I myself have been up since very early, making connecting flights. And still my day is not over."

Ted seized the thing roundly. "What sort of business are you in, if it's no harm to ask?"

"I am a consultant. Specialising in pharmaceutical trade." The little dictator removed his sunglasses and began to polish them on his handkerchief.

Well, at least he wasn't a jack-booted thug!

"I am not used to talking to fewer than five thousand people at a time", he continued, "for fear of being misunderstood. However, I shall make a beginning.

"It is horrifying to think of the consequences of chance. One man begins a great career as an officer in the European Theatre; another, no less gifted, has his head blown off as soon as he steps out of the landing craft. Why does that happen? Who is to blame? Who will account for it?"

Here the little man swigged his coffee. Ted noted that his hair, seemingly dark brown, was really an artificial boot-brown colour. Ted formed a reply: "Well, I suppose it would depend how you look - "

But the other man was not to be denied: "It is no accident that the corporate hegemony of a small group of - "

Ted sprang into action. More on that next week.


   
  

  Fun at Home
A Pious Memory

 

 


When Chris heard God had invited Himself to the party, he thought it was all over. There was probably no getting around it, though. "What they do on tv", said Bill, "is invite a Catholic priest, a Rabbi, and a minister as well. To sort of get their collective spin on it."

"But this isn't a tv show", said Chris, "it's a party. A little get-together for a bunch of friends, some of whom are leaving in a couple weeks. And anyway, that approach always comes off as a tired, unfunny joke, predictable, you know...I don't know why everyone acts as if tv meant something."

"Yeah. I had this dream I was watching tv last night. But then I realised dreams are kind of like tv, only not as good. We'd better go to the liquor store."

"Just let me get my coat."

God phoned around 8:00 to say He would be along soon. "Want me to bring anything?" he asked.

"Just yourself, man," said Chris. People always brought too much junk. There was always a surplus of snack-food bags and dip the next day.

"Okay", said God. "After all, I am That Am, you know."

People started turning up a little later:

"Sheila!" said Chris, greeting one of his guests, "So you managed to find the address."

"Yeah - sorry I'm late, but - "

"No problem. So, are you excited about your new job?"

"Yes, it's - "

"Dirk!" said Chris, greeting another guest, "Glad you could make it, are you excited about the new job?"

"Well - it's kind of not what I'm looking for, but it's in the right area. And I didn't want to have to move to - "

"And your girlfriend? Is she ...?"

"In Norway." And he began to look as if he would like to scowl, but instead turned to the consuming business of installing some cans of beer in the fridge. Other people skulked around the kitchen. A party had erupted.

A little later Chris noticed God levelling a tequila shot and saying, "I'm gonna have a wicked case of the guilts tomorrow."

God put cucumber slices over his eyes and said, "Look at Me. I am become weird."

Around 2:00 am God hooked up His guitar and started playing "Stairway to Heaven" really loud. Most of the people who had fallen asleep woke up and staggered back to the party. He played pretty well. Then He segued into "Born to be Wild", which He played rather better. The sheer noise was an audial colossus, making the dishes tremble even in the kitchen.

"Get Him out of here, the man's an animal," said Bill.

Chris looked at God from the door into the kitchen. "Oh, I don't know. I don't think he's going to do anything too serious."

"No, I mean the noise. The neighbours'll be like - "

"Any problem?" asked God. He was coming to get some more wine. Since He was no longer playing the guitar there didn't seem to by any need to admonish Him.

A little later something happened. But was that before or after the police dropped by? And later still, God was found lying in the driveway. They carried Him into a bedroom.

Is He ok?

Did He hurt himself?

In the morning they opened the bedroom door to find He had gone.

"Now what do we do?" asked Chris.


   
  

  At the —
History of Painting

 

 


I am confronted with a roomful of wild canvases, one every three feet or so. I should like to be able to make something of them, of each one, I am eager to look and see. I so want this to be a happy occasion, matching the success of my haircut, clean shirt, and the perfectly-lit, high- ceilinged gallery in which I find myself. The first work is a smear of toothpaste on a background of tar. Okay, I'll come back to it. The next one is a painting of a doll with severe injuries. I would rather not look at that for too long. Next: a smear of something on an untreated canvas. This is interesting. What is that stuff? Has it been melted on? Next: a big smear on a big canvas. It is faintly s-shaped, like a meandering river of industrial waste through an indifferent wilderness. I suspect that polysaccharides have contributed to the very exciting texture. But once again we are confronted with the work.

A man behind me starts explaining the historical phonology of Tibetan, making it all a bit clearer by citing some examples from Proto-Tibeto-Burman, and a few moments later I am smoking a cigarette outside somewhere.


   
  

  Fifty Toyes
A Story for Children

 

 


Before B. retired to his room for the rest of his life, people kept coming up to him and complaining, "I've run out of ideas. I don't know what to think about any more," and he would reply, "How can I help? Why would you think I could help? I haven't had a thought in years. I have stared into space, chatted with people I supposedly know, watched tv, read weekly news magazines. I've watched grown men play with each other as a form of entertainment. I haven't really had to think. Moreover, I am retiring now because of a general lack of benevolence. Also, I can't find my umbrella, which makes my going out a non-starter, kind of. I may set fire to a bundle of words and pour a can of emotions over them later, so - drop in whenever. I would enjoy the company. You know." All this to forestall the observation that he was, himself, lazy and indifferent, or was merely hiding from something. Of course he had books and a tv, so what harm could there be in not going anywhere? However, reasonable people can no longer hope to get very far by argumentation that appeals to reason, since they are probably arguing with unreasonable people, as statistics can be made to show. And as he thought this, it occurred to him: compiling statistics was one of the innumerable things he could do now, in the freedom of his room.


   
  

  Anne of Green Gables
A Part of Our Heritage

 

 


Anne of Green Gables. Anne of Green Gables. Anne of Green Gables. Do people never tire of that? Anne of Green Gables. Based on the novel Anne of Green Gables. I assume there was such a person, once: Anne of Green Gables. I sort of wondered about her after I had heard the name for, oh, the ten thousandth time. I read somewhere that "Anne of Green Gables is a trademark and a Canadian official mark of the Anne of Green Gables Licensing Authority Inc." So you see? If you were thinking of calling your novel Anne of Green Gables, don't. You understand why that would be wrong, don't you? People would accuse you of trying to "cash in", so to speak, and that would tend to cast a mercenary shadow over the spirit of Anne of Green Gables. The argument of the novel Anne of Green Gables is as follows: some people want to adopt a boy who can help out on the farm; they are disappointed when they get a girl instead. This girl is Anne Shirley, later to be known as Anne of Green Gables and, later still, as a trademark and a Canadian official mark of the Anne of Green Gables Licensing Authority Inc. She has red hair and freckles, she is irrepressible, and she proves to be just as good as any boy, in fact much, much better. This bodes well for the whole community. That's the whole plot. Probably quicker to identify it by its children's literature motif number.

The book could have been called Anne of Green Gables Makes Her Bones, but that makes for rather a long title. It could have been more interesting, though: Anne would be the village drunk, stealing other women's menfolk, dealing drugs, and coming home in the morning to threaten her foster parents with the .22 and demand money. Eventually she gets an important job in the government through some people she used to party with. But this is not what happens in Anne of Green Gables. Nowhere do you hear of her being an alcoholic, or having her neglected children taken into charge, or her endless squabbles with social services, or her many appearances in court accompanied by a different leering car thief each time. None of that appears in the novel Anne of Green Gables, or in any of the other canonical Anne books. Why is that?


   
  
· Here you'll find rather more irrelevant mini essays, roughly categorized somehow. I wish I could be more clear.

· Bibliographical Notes
— Old Books
— Duhamel Bibliography
· Annals of Public Neurosis
— Peace Tricks
· Almost a Complete Thought
· Stories
— Reveille
— Fun at Home
— A Story
— At the —
— A Story for Children
— Anne of Green Gables
  Back to Top

The contents and design of this page are entirely homemade.
I copied a few things from way better pages of course.